Wednesday, January 5, 2011

70-200..... Nikkor vs canon

  (Updated: 25th April 2012)


  If you are asked "Which will be the lens you would love to carry while you are on the African Jungle Safari or The Olympics, without compromising the quality and being tricked by the focal length?"

        No doubt, 70-200 f/2.8 VR/IS will be your first answer, then gradually you would turn to 70-300 for focal length or price, but off course not full heartedly.

   This must to have Pro series of telephoto lens gets its unmatched place due to its key focal range and the aperture as wide as f/2.8...


  [The market is bloomed with lenses from your camera manufacturer and the most marketed accessory makers, but if you think wise, you wont go for third party]


   Here is The most common Line-Up of both Canon and Nikkor Forces.. ( in alphabetical order, with links to check latest price).

  1. Canon EF 70-200 f/4L IS USM
  2. Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS USM
  3. Nikkor AF 80-200 f/2.8D ED
  4. Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8 ED VR
  5. Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8 ED VR II
  I was ambiguous for the same while making a budget for my first ever full frame D-SLR. Being a Nikonian basically I finished with Nikkor ED VR II (though don't own yet).
  During this course, I came across many reviews, Discussions and Hands-ons. So, here I'm with enough to talk about.

1. Canon EF 70-200 f/4L IS USM and Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8 ED
  Both lies in the price range around 1100 to 1300 $ range at various stores and as per the availabilities.(4L is around 100$ expensive)

  Primary observation here is that, the Canon 4L has the integrated Image Stabilization and the Ultra Sonic Motor.
  Basically fast lenses are known to have wide aperture,
No matter whether it is an IS lens or not, the f/2.8 is the fast on paper. But the Canon's classic IS system changes the game. Its IS is 2 stop better than normal stabilized lenses. So it is fast too. Nikon 80-200 does not focus automatically on basic camera bodies (D3100,D3200,D5100) and fails with teleconverter too. While canon 4L can focus with 1.4x. (at f/5.6)
  If the white paint of the pro spec (L-series) fantasies you. surely, you'd get a 4L IS USM rather than the non-VR 2.8D

2.Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM & Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G ED VR
           



    The Nikkor Glass costs something like 2200$ and Canon 2100$
The the smallest difference lies between the VR of being II, which is practically 6 stops better (though Nikon claims it for 4 stops alone..)
Both the Lenses are The Best zoom lenses by respective manufacturers, with IQ directly comparable with 85 f/1.8 or 200 f/2.0.


    

Canon 70-200 2.8L IS USM


 (The Basic Construction of these lenses is somewhat similar)

   The Extra low Dispersion elements plays all draining out the threats of Ghosts and Flares. Non-visible distortion, (If you are not using a magnifier for pictures to blame it !...)

All the lenses listed are the best at their respective manufacturers.  The decision remains to the camera body you own, or the price you afford.

Verdict :
Well, my personal choice would be Nikon AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G If ED VR (I). Nikon has dropped its price tag significantly considering  it's chronic battle against canon.
- The Opinions are personal supported by various reviews.
 - Any discussion or Complains are welcome by author - Sudarshan at s_kalwale@yahoo.co.in
B&H

D7000's prices to drop down


 The Nikon D7000 is no doubt a good gadget for enthusiasts to have, but it yet seems to be bit expensive. (Rs.84000/- MRP for the Indian Market).
  The B&H photo USA sells it at 1199$  i.e. Rs.59950/- only......
  Hope Nikon would surely show mercy for its lover hub -India.
 - The Opinions are personal supported by various reviews.
        - Any discussion or Complains are welcome by author - Sudarshan at s_kalwale@yahoo.co.in

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Survival Of Nikon D90, D3000, & D700

Hello friends,
                    Its a long time the Nikon's master crafts, The D700 and The D90 have been in the market. These top of the grade cameras were surely the leaders of their time, and are surely till date. But their existance may be challanged due to various reasons.
Lets see one by one reasons for that.

Nikon D700....


        Released in mid 2008, The Nikon D700 is the class leading 35mm D-SLR. The Second Best ISO performer later D3s, this camera has recently loosened its heavy price tag. Later released Canon 5D MK II theorotically eqauls the ISO of the Nikon D700 but as per the photographs compared by most of the people, D700 proves to be about 2 stop better. The lack of movie function (not necessory) and the resolution (12MP Vs 21MP) are the key points (mostly amateurs think about, not the pros).
       But, Before purchasing Nikon D700 one surely thinks about, the age of the technolodgy. Nikon's APS-c Size sensors now a days perform great in terms of ISO, though not comparable with D700, fit in budget (Below 2000 $) along some good lenses. The crop factor which is the boon for the wildlife and sports photographers also is a considerable matter.
      [Nikon D7000 released earlier with 16MP resolution and normal ISO range of 6400, Corner Mg alloy body and tough weather sealling (generally not provided for this price) is a considerable alternative for low budget high demand amateurs].

               ...Major Thing One Should Concern Before Purchasing D700 is , New Alternative is Not In The Nikon Product Pipe-Line, So We Wont Need To Repent On Not Waiting For Expeed II and 102k ISO, and sure, a 35mm full frame sensor with additional pixel count, And All at the price of the D700 or bit more.......


D90....



      The D90 was called King Of APS-c, couple of years ago. First to incorporate the Movie feature, Nikon D90 yet lures the entry semi-pro line-up of the beginers.
      [The low cost camera, the brand new Nikon D3100 has it all to think over.
      ....14.6MP resolution 6400 ISO for an emergency and the Full HD feature are the highlits of this big featured small package. The most important is the new Expeed II processor in it]


The New Rival
      D7000










D3000


                                             Can D3000 stand against new D3100  
No need to give more reasons for the challeges for existence of Nikon D3000.
Its 10.2 effective megapixel CCD sensor and noisy images even at ISO 400 gives wide scope for its extinction...
    No dought the succider D3100 gets all the responsiblity to throw it out of the market..........



        - The Opinions are personal supported by various reviews.
        - Any discussion or Complains are welcome by author - Sudarshan at s_kalwale@yahoo.co.in